« Yours, Mine, and Ours | Main | Out and Loud »

January 09, 2007

AP Style Rules! (I guess)

I updated the post below, “Yours, Mine, and Ours,” after several of my colleagues pointed out that AP Style says to add only the apostrophe after names ending in s, like Degas, Camus, and Watts (as in Naomi), instead of apostrophe-s, which I had originally suggested. Along with Patricia T. O’Conner, whose excellent book I usually defer to, as well as with the masters Strunk and White, I think the rule should be to add apostrophe-s (Camus’s ennui). Still, as I note below, my company’s default is AP Style, and so I should have at the very least pointed out the discrepancy between my opinion and that of AP Style. The post now reflects AP Style’s rule. On a related note, check out this posting from a colleague and fellow blogger on the trials and tribulations of blogging.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2095190/7436156

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AP Style Rules! (I guess):

Comments

Excellent blog!

Your focus on being accurate and proper is much appreciated.
Everyone on my Marcom team (including vendors) is now required to RSS subscribe to your blog.

Keep up the good work. We all appreciate what you are doing.

Question: Does “third party” have a hyphen between the words? How about “third parties”?

I’ve been told different rules about it depending whether it’s singular or plural, or if it’s used as a noun/subject or an adjective.

This would be very useful for us in DC to know since third-parties/third parties are frequently used.

If you’re using “third party” as a modifier you’d want to hyphenate it, as in “third –party supporters.” But if you’re referring to “a third party relating to a government investigation,” no hyphen would be necessary.

Dan,

Love what I see so far. "Word Wise" is especially timely given the liberties taken with language in the blogosphere. Rest assured that your blog will be on the must-read list for Kent State PR students this semester along with my note that says, “See, I’m not the only one who thinks this stuff matters.”

Idea: I see one comment on this post deals with hyphenating compound modifiers. You may want to post a full-blown and much-needed lesson on the topic someday. Over the past few years I’ve seen fewer and fewer folks inserting the hyphens. Do they not know the rules, or do you think language is morphing toward elimination of CM hyphenation?

Bill, thank you for your incredibly kind message (and hello Kent State PR students!). I’ll take your advice and do a more detailed posting soon on compound modifiers, those two-or-more word adjectival (and occasionally adverbial) phrases that seem to confuse otherwise well-adjusted people….

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

My Photo

Why "Word Wise"?

  • When I started to send out a weekly writing tip to my Chicago colleagues at Edelman (the world's largest privately owned PR firm), little did I know how quickly the list of those receiving it would grow. But word spread, as word is wont to do, and for the past three years about 1,500 of my 2,400 colleagues worldwide have been receiving it. The tips, which are about grammar, usage and style, have a dual purpose – to remind my colleagues in public relations of the power of the written word (I’m lucky to work for a company that not only prizes, but expects, expert communications skills), and, more generally, to support and perpetuate clear, concise, creative, honest, lively, stylish, compelling writing everywhere. With “Word Wise,” I hope you’ll challenge me, challenge other readers, make suggestions, argue minutiae, add commentary, exchange ideas, and help all of us become the best writers we can be.