The power of words comes, in part, from their meaning and from their placement within sentences and phrases. It also comes from the integrity with which they’re being used. In public relations, advertising and marketing, we’re especially susceptible to latching onto of-the-moment words and using them and using them and using them until they’re used to death (their meaning and power dies). Half the time we use these words it’s because we have no idea what the heck we’re talking about in the first place. Here’s my abridged list of words that have fallen into that death trap. They’ve become so overused and misused that they’ve lost whatever powers of description they had to begin with. To use them today and expect them to have an impact is simply laughable.
If every time you’re about to use one of these words you stop and force yourself to think of a new way of saying whatever it is you want to say, a) you’ll be doing the world a favor; b) you’ll force yourself to think about what it is you really want to say; and c) your writing will be more vivid, more true, and far more compelling. |
Note: You can almost feel it when a word or phrase is slipping into the mire of meaninglessness. Watch for these to soon fall off the cliff: green, sustainable and value proposition. Any others you can think of?
The compulsion for people or organizations to refer to themselves as "leading" is generally quite absurd, but there's one that gets me even more: Every time I see the word "leverage" -- unless its in the context of physics -- I throw up a little in my mouth.
Posted by: Mike Keliher | July 14, 2007 at 09:28 AM
Maximized / maximum
Posted by: Robert | July 14, 2007 at 09:34 AM
horrific
Posted by: Virginia | July 14, 2007 at 09:46 AM
Ugh - leverage. And "monetize." That one really gets under my skin.
Posted by: Lisa Braithwaite | July 14, 2007 at 03:35 PM
Dan, I can barely stand to read your list -- that's how on target it is. As a writer, and communications strategist, I know how easy it is to fall into the trap of repetition. After all, it works on audiences -- up to a point -- and then it backfires.
The question seems to be how to see that turning point. Any ideas?
Posted by: Nancy E. Schwartz | July 16, 2007 at 08:10 AM
Synergistic and its root, synergy, are the ones that make me gag the most. I have a client who leans on them and it drives me nuts.
Plus, both words always remind me of the 1980s cartoon Jem in which the main characters, an all-girl rock band, frequently said "Showtime, Synergy!" It definitely makes it harder to take seriously and documents that include those words.
Posted by: Veronica | July 16, 2007 at 10:51 AM
Dan, I'm completely in agreement with you on these words. What I've been wondering about lately is the new (over)use of the phrases "speak to," as in "I can speak to that" and "cover off," as in "I think I've covered off answers to all of your questions." Where did this come from? I'd never heard it before I started working with a big company.
Posted by: mochalala | July 17, 2007 at 09:53 AM
micro and macro anything drive me crazy.
Posted by: trollop23 | July 17, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Hi Dan, Thanks for the tip.
May I take the liberty of adding ‘end-to-end’ to your list. I think it is one of the most abused words in this part of the world.(APAC)
Posted by: Suchitra | July 17, 2007 at 07:33 PM
The ones I have banned from my startup company are:
"play", as in "it's a xxxx play".
and
"landscape", as in "we're in a competitive landscape".
Posted by: ben | July 18, 2007 at 05:41 PM
Everyone please e-mail a link to this post to every consultant you know, especially the really famous ones.
The next time I hear "best-of-breed" used to describe anything but a dog, I'm going to scream!
Posted by: Glenn (Customer Service Experience) Ross | July 19, 2007 at 04:59 PM
I would add 'impact' to the list as it is horribly overused.
Posted by: Jed | July 20, 2007 at 07:01 PM
How about "out of pocket"? It doesn't even make sense!
Posted by: Selfmademom | July 24, 2007 at 09:58 PM
Two comments:
1. I agree with Selfmademom about "out of pocket" -- I always thought it referred to expenses one paid from personal cash not the state of being unavailable.
2. I have to use "bandwidth" quite often because I write about satellite capacity, so when I see it in a context that doesn't have anything to do with Mbps or MHz, I get a little cranky.
Posted by: Eileen | July 25, 2007 at 10:27 PM
You forgot my two favorites: 1. "socialize" used to describe getting others familiar with a proposal before bringing it for approval...drives me crazy!...and
2. "Reaching out" to someone - an HR favorite -why not just call them?
Posted by: Elaine | July 26, 2007 at 03:47 PM
I came here because I find myself getting angry every time I see or herar the word 'leverage' - I think you use it more in the US than we do in the UK but it is a totally meaningless term to me. See this in a job description I have been sent...
responsibilities include 'Building highly leveraged sales tools' ! What nonsense !
Posted by: Janet | July 27, 2007 at 05:07 AM
I agree with every word here. However, I use 'proactive' quite often, as in proactive vs. reactive media inquiry. Really, I can't think of another word we'd use to describe that.
Posted by: Silvie | August 09, 2007 at 09:43 AM
Any of the "ize" words which take a noun and turn it into a verb. Some of these are pointed out above. The worst is "prioritize". This is a gripe found in places other than the business world.
Posted by: Locomotive Breath | August 12, 2007 at 09:44 AM
What about "that being said" and "having said that"? Experts use that all the time right before they contradict themselves. And then they stutter, to sound knowledgeable I suppose. "But ... But ... But I ... I ... I have always said that the ... the ... the state of the economy, etc."
Posted by: EG Blue | September 20, 2007 at 12:09 PM
Anyone have any innovative words to describe innovation?
Posted by: Michael b | October 15, 2007 at 01:35 AM
To this list I have to add "learnings". It is NOT a word.
Thanks for letting me get this off my chest.
Posted by: DirtsDad | October 20, 2007 at 11:41 AM
"To use them today and expect them to have an impact is simply laughable."
Good lord, that was written tongue-in-check I hope. Certainly it can't have escaped your notice that there is no case of a word being overused more than that of "impact" being employed as a metaphorically (as it most certainly is not a synonym) for the word "effect".
Posted by: R.F. Scott | June 10, 2008 at 04:35 PM